|
Recreational
Uses of Cal Poly Land
Research Findings Concerning Carrying Capacity
|
Research
on Natural Resource Factors Summary: |
- Almost
all resource impacts occur under light level of recreational
use; and additional levels of use causes relatively additional
impact
- Secondary
effects of impact are often more important than primary
impacts (e.g. soil compaction--increased runoff, soil
erosion, sedimentation in streams, stressed cold water
fish)
- In
assessing ecological impact with recreation it can be
difficult to determine the most appropriate indicator
of the impact
- Many
ecological impacts are subject to some degree of management
control (e.g. location of trails, mandatory campsites,
etc.)
- Most
studies have been on impacts to soils and vegetation with
little data on impacts to air, water, wildlife
|
Research
on Social Factors Summary: |
- It
is important to distinguish the concept of crowding from
the more simple concept of amount of use--intensive use
does not have same
perception as crowding; crowding variable--lots at the
beach, few in the wilderness--a perception
- Crowding
norms are a function of more than just the number of other
users. Factors affecting include: motivation underlying
recreation participation, preferences and expectations
of recreators
- There
appears to be considerable consensus on what constitutes
crowding among like-minded groups, but not necessarily
between groups or across the population as a whole
- In
assessing the effects of crowding, researchers and managers
have difficulty selecting an appropriate criterion measure.
Number of encounters between groups seems to be the best
measure of perceived encounters and not density of recreators.
- Recreator
satisfaction is a complex, multifaceted concept. If want
information about crowding have directed focused studies
in this topical area.
|
Research
on Managerial Factors Summary: |
- Many
techniques are available for maintaining outdoor recreational
areas within their carrying capacities (broad strategies
include: reduce the amount of use, provide additional
opportunities in other places, modify the character of
the use, harden the site).
- Management
actions are often categorized either direct or indirect.
Direct focuses of recreator behavior with little choice--rules/regs.,
mandatory. Indirect focuses attempts to influence
recreator behavior with information/education, facility
development, user fees, etc.
- Research
to date indicates that a variety of management actions
can be effective in implementing carrying capacity. Criteria
for evaluation include: effectiveness in influencing visitor
behavior, acceptability to recreators, practicality. Very
few studies concerning assessment of management actions
and their effectiveness.
|
|
|
|